HyperChat vs Chatbase.
Credits vs flat.
Same category — a chatbot trained on your website. Different billing philosophy: Chatbase meters message credits and charges $1,188 a year to take its badge off. HyperChat is £49 flat, everything in. Here's the maths.
Chatbase's Hobby plan is $32/mo for just 500 message credits, Standard $120/mo for 4,000, auto-recharge $40 per 1,000, and removing its branding costs $1,188 a year — as of July 2026. HyperChat Live is £49 flat with 5,000 answers and your own branding included. Chatbase wins on model choice; HyperChat wins on price and simplicity.
5,000 answers a month.
Two very different bills.
The scenario: a UK business website answering around 5,000 visitor questions a month, with its own branding. All Chatbase figures as of July 2026, per chatbase.co/pricing.
HOBBY'S $32 BUYS JUST 500 CREDITS · USD BILLING
≈ £1,872/YEAR SAVED AT THIS VOLUME
Even at Chatbase Hobby's tiny 500-credit allowance, you're paying $32 + $99/mo-equivalent to de-brand ≈ £104 — for one-tenth of HyperChat's included answers, at over twice the price.
Line by line.
| HyperChat £49 | Chatbase | |
|---|---|---|
| Trained on your website | ✓ ~60 seconds, done for you | ✓ You assemble the sources |
| Monthly allowance | 5,000 answers, flat | 500–12,000 credits by tier, then auto-recharge |
| Own branding | ✓ Included | $1,188/yr extra |
| AI model choice | Tuned for you | ✓ Several models to pick from |
| Data source types | Your website, tuned simply | ✓ Files, text, sites, many connectors |
| Billing currency | GBP, UK invoices | USD |
| Automations | Signed webhooks, API, Zapier/Make/n8n | API + integrations by tier |
| Beyond the limit | Safe pause, no bill shock | Auto-recharge keeps billing |
Where Chatbase genuinely
wins.
Chatbase is a good product. Two things it does better than us today:
Model choice
Chatbase lets you pick between several underlying AI models per bot. If experimenting with models is part of the fun — or the requirement — that's a real strength we deliberately don't offer: HyperChat tunes the model for you so answers stay grounded.
Ecosystem breadth
More source types, more connectors, a longer track record and a big user community. If your knowledge lives across twelve systems rather than one website, Chatbase's plumbing is broader. Ours is simpler because a website is quite enough for most businesses.
Where HyperChat
now wins.
Honesty cuts both ways. Three things your HyperChat bot does that a Chatbase bot doesn't:
It exams itself before launch
Every build sits a pre-flight exam: ten questions drawn from your own website, judged for groundedness, plus five adversarial probes (injection, jailbreak, price-fishing). Your portal shows the score — "your bot passed 9/10 checks" — before a single visitor chats. No assembling sources and hoping.
It never invents an answer
Runtime guardrails screen every message for prompt injection before it costs a token, and when confidence is low the bot says so and offers to take the visitor's details instead — a dead end becomes a lead. It will not make up your prices, hours or policies.
It improves itself, not your workload
Visitors rate answers 👍/👎. Unanswered questions are clustered into a "content gaps" list in your portal — type the answer once, it's in the knowledge base instantly, no rebuild, no credit meter ticking. A weekly email digest rounds up gaps, leads and your bot's score.
Switching, and other
questions.
Is HyperChat cheaper than Chatbase?
Where does Chatbase beat HyperChat?
Aren’t both just "trained on your website" bots?
How do Chatbase credits compare to HyperChat answers?
Can I switch from Chatbase to HyperChat?
Does HyperChat use the same AI models as Chatbase?
Also comparing? HyperChat vs Tidio · HyperChat vs Intercom · UK chatbot cost guide · pricing
Same website. Same questions. A fifth of the bill.
Build your bot free in 60 seconds and compare the answers yourself. No card, no credit meter.
Build my chatbot · free